‘Electoral Credibility’ but at what cost to Labour Party Policies

Sir Kier Starmer keeps dropping in phrases about the Labour Party’s  electoral  credibility but what is unclear about his focus on this issue is the cost to the Labour  Party’s policies  and ambitions. Clearly he is modelling his attempt  to regain power on those of Blair, modelling Labour’s appeal not on striking difference to the Tories but instead on the lines of similarity and fiscal responsibility. In reality  such an approach makes sure of constraints on ambition. Is Starmer actually  using budget constraints as an excuse for lack of ambition? Is he rejecting the idea that you actually  need to spend to invest and reap rewards ? Lack of investment  equals lack of ambition in this case and another missed opportunity  to really  change Britain  for the long term  good and to finally  get an opportunity to reverse the harm that Thatcherism has done to Britain. By so doing He has forfeited  on many policies at the heart of the core values of his Party.

Britain needs ambition and a strong commitment to change but Kier Starmer seems to be undoing Labour’s resolve

There is a strong feeling that Starmer is unwilling to invest  in those policies at the heart of core Labour values those which his predecessor Corbyn championed and which Starmer  supported at the time. Sir Kier Starmer is now unwilling  to invest in developing and taking forward into government those key policies and instead he is willing to drop them in order to make him look like he places greater emphasis  on fiscal responsibility. However prior to this shift in focus it was these very policies that actually  differentiated the Labour Party from the Tories.  Now, instead, he is willing to seek power to simply act as an accountant, custodian  and security officer, without any real ambition  to change Britain  for the greater good. Is this sounding very similar to what took place under Tony Blair’s administration?  Britain  deserves  better than another missed opportunity  by the Labour Party to really change Britain  and finally turn our back on the failed  policies of Thatcherism. Britain  needs ambitions. Britain needs ambitious  policies and radical reform not a custodian. More recently Starmer has reshuffled his cabinet to include many of the previous Blairite members. Is Starmer going to throw away a real chance to change Britain in the same way that Tony Blair did? Having power is useless if you don’t intend to do anything with it. What I am sensing about Starmer that he has no real strong commitment to change. Instead he seems obsessed  about holding office in the same way that Tony Blair was and he is willing to sell out on Labour Party values and principles in order to do so in exactly the same way as Blair.

Modelling the Labour Party purely based on the desires of  the electorate to have a moderate leader offering moderate change instead of radical change seems to be a Labour Party Leadership trait and a huge mistake. It underestimates the current desire of the majority of the electorate to embrace real sweeping changes. This underestimate and lack of being in touch with scale of desire amongst the public for real change in Britain has already cost the Labour Party dearly in Scotland where Labour’s  losses have resulted in SNP gains. In Scotland Labour were simply seen as unambitious and too much like the Tories. The SDP were simply more appealing  with policies relating to free education etc.

To change the Labour  Party’s  policies and values in response to the low expectations of the public and on public perception of what to expect from centre and centre right public opinion is wrong. It’s  also a situation that the public may not even wish to vote for Labour because the two parties  are becoming almost indistinguishable from each other:  in which case what would be the point because it would be a change that wouldn’t  accomplish anything anyway. That is the danger of Starmer’s  strategy. As in the case in Scotland  the public tend to prefer a case whereby  they can really see a marked difference  between political parties. That offers the public a real choice so when they get fed up with one then they can be assured that the other will offer real change and not just tinkering. If the public are not in a position  to accept what Labour are offering then so be it. It’s  not the right thing for the Party to change to try and cultivate and ingratiate itself to the public. Soon Labour  will  have no policies left if they carry on down this road.

The public will come to Labour when they are ready for real change and are sick of the what the Tories  have been offering. I believe  that this is currently the situation  that Britain  finds itself in so now is certainly not the time for the Party to have self doubts and be introspective or to change  anything like key policies.

Starmer’s Labour Party have misunderstood the real reasons why they lost the last General Election

The New Labour of Blair was really  a missed opportunity of Labour to make real changes to Britain. Blair was a traitor to the values of the Labour  Party. So obsessed with getting control for controls sake he watered down the Policies of the Labour Movement to such a point whereby the change of administration from the Tories to the Labour Party was hardly noticeable. Blair failed to reverse the damage of Tory Thatcherite policies. All Blair did was tinkering  and self serving admiration. Blair was a traitor  to the Labour Movement. Blair was no more than a Tory Cuckoo. It would be a massive mistake for Starmer to uphold the work of Blair and attempt to do the same.

Starmer’s ambition  is simply to make Labour electable without any real ambition to change Britain  for the better. Starmer’s  ambition is to be an accountant or custodian without attempting  any change or creativity with the resources. He is afraid to be seen to be spending so if his Labour  Party gets in office his legacy will again be of failure and a missed opportunity  to actually  change Britain for the better. He will ultimately  be remembered  as a failure like Tony Blair.

All we have from Starmer so far are clues and broken promises. What he wanted to accomplish seems to be continually narrowing. As a Labour  Party member I find it continually  frustrating  that I simply do not know what Labour  stands for any longer. I am being asked to support a Party where  I don’t  actually  know it’s  values or what it intends to do when and possibly  if it gets into power. It also appears that I am being to asked to support a Labour Party who’s values almost resemble those of the Tories. It seems that this continued pursuit of power comes at a cost that Labour will inevitably  water down it’s  policies  and ambitions  to the point that it resembles both Blair’s  New Labour and also its  main opponent  the Tories. Starmer’s  Labour has become so paranoid about its loss in the last election without actually finding the real reason why it lost. To my mind Labour lost because of the publics will to see Brexit finally done. It’s  not so much about not liking Labour’s  policies  on matters such as re-nationalisation  it was simply that it believed Boris would finally put the Brexit question to bed. The public did not believe that Corbyn was as committed. What has happened since then is that Starmer believed he had to go down the same path as Blair to make the Labour Party electable again. This was and still is a huge mistake alienating the left of his Party. History  has already seen what a huge mistake this was under Blair who simply has no lasting legacy other than being a wasted opportunity to change Britain  for the better and reverse the policies of successive Thatcherite Administrations. To this day Thatcherism  still survives in Britain and is the thing still holding back Britain  from being Great again. So why is Starmer  attempting  to follow Blair down that same path of abject failure. Why is he distancing himself further and further from Labour’s core policies?

To be the Party in power means very little  at all if you are simply going to accept that you cannot  change anything or do anything but tinker. Power and acceptability often don’t  go hand in hand bit this is the position  which Starmer’s  Labour seeks. It seems that Starmer has failed to understand the failure of Tony Blair’s  Labour. To mimic that would again be a mistake and a lost opportunity.

Despite loosing the last election under Jeremy  Corbyn the Labour Party’s membership actually  increased and this was because  of his radical policies that offered an opportunity for Britain  to finally change course and move away from Thatcherite  policies once and for all. These policies spoke to a younger membership. Corbyn made Labour a valid opposition again with policies that we both in step with core Labour  Party  values and that were totally  different  from those of the Tories. Unfortunately Starmer has failed to understand that Labour did not lose the last Election  on policies. It lost it on the fact that most people were quite sick of the Stalemate that the Brexit debate had become mired up in. The public did not see that Corbyn  had a clear strategy on Brexit and they were fearful of more protracted debate over the matter that they believed Corbyn  would be dragging us into. They saw that Johnson had a clearer agenda and  a clearer path to finally put the Brexit question  to bed. The last election  was simply about Brexit and nothing to do with any other policies. At that time there was simply nothing wrong with what Corbyn’s Labour Party had to offer but the public saw that the most pressing topic was that of Brexit. Also very little  to do with the fact that the right-wing press ( those so called newspapers that pretend to represent the working classes: but in reality  are simply cuckoo’s representing the right) saw Corbyn  as an easy target for so called made up looney leftist. In reality  they saw him as a credible threat to their intrests.  A real threat.

Starmer’s  reaction to all this has simply been akin to a paranoia and deep self introspection. Self loathing to find favour from the public was Starmer’s  answer. Starmer’s  team have misinterpreted the real reasons that lay more with a public desire than any fault of Corbyn’s Labour Party. However Starmer rushed to change what didn’t  need to be changed. The path to a Blairist revival had begun. Huge mistake.

Leave a Reply